EVIDENCE LANGUAGE · CLAIM LEVEL
A verdict is not a person score
BYBI verdicts summarise what the current evidence says about a defined claim. They do not rate a person’s intelligence, intent or overall value.
Four verdicts
Plain language for the state of the claim
The label is a navigation aid. The evidence, limitations and decision rule carry the meaning.
SUPPORTED
The central claim survives the test
Relevant evidence is sufficiently strong and consistent for the stated scope, with no omitted limitation that overturns the practical conclusion.
SUPPORTED WITH LIMITS
Useful under defined conditions
The mechanism or outcome is credible, but important boundaries, prerequisites or downsides restrict where the advice should be applied.
NOT ESTABLISHED
The current record is insufficient
The claim may be plausible, but evidence quality, relevance or completeness does not yet justify the confident conclusion being promoted.
MISLEADING OR UNSUPPORTED
The framing exceeds the evidence
The claim conflicts with stronger evidence, relies on a material omission or presents an inference as if it were established fact.
Confidence layer
How stable is the conclusion?
Confidence is reported separately because a cautious verdict based on an incomplete record is different from the same verdict backed by strong, convergent evidence.
Verdict triggers
What can change the label?
New primary evidence, corrected source data, a better-specified population, credible replication, a material conflict or a demonstrated failure case can all change the verdict or its confidence. The affected page should state the most important change trigger explicitly.
READ THE FULL RECORD
